Jump to content


Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum

Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account.
As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends.

Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games.

If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top.
If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen.

Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
Guest Message by DevFuse
 

bushindo

Member Since --
Offline Last Active Yesterday, 10:49 PM
*****

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Winoc Sells

23 May 2013 - 08:03 PM



Winoc sells four types of products.  The resources needed to produce one unit of each and the sales prices is listed below:

 

Resource                       Product 1                         Product 2                       Product 3                         Product 4

Raw Material                         2                                       3                                    4                                      7

Hours of labor                       3                                       4                                    5                                      6

Sales Price ($)                      4                                       6                                    7                                      8

 

Currently, 4,600 units of raw material and 5,000 labor hours are available.To meet customer demands, exactly 950 total units must be produced.  Customers also demand that at least 400 units of product 4 be produced.    What is the solution that maximizes Winoc's sales revenue?

 

Here's my try

Spoiler for

In Topic: The Best Performer

17 May 2013 - 04:29 AM

 


Let a, b, c, and d stand for the fraction of a project that A, B, C, and D can do within each day, respectively.
Spoiler for

 

I like your answer.  It is interesting how in America this problem is solved differently from my home country.

 

 

I'm intrigued. How do people from your country solve this problem?


In Topic: The Best Performer

17 May 2013 - 03:59 AM

 


 

Spoiler for

Allow me to rephrase cause I disagree: Including someone on a project and excluding someone else directly affects the amount of days a project takes. So in terms of making a three man team we can determine the day load attributed to each person (as well as rank them by productivity). In terms of proportional pay for effectiveness this is very important as we in manufacturing projects pay individuals incentives based on their individual contribution to group projects.
 
So, by your later question, are you asking for how long each individual would take to complete the project working on his/her own? [edit from here] This would then, of course, make that proportional payment easier, using [actual time]/[individual time] to determine the proportion of total payment each individual should receive.
 
essentially, i am asking how much of the duration is caused by each individual on the three man team if we assume that a person is just as productive no matter who they work with
 
 
 
Let a, b, c, and d stand for the fraction of a project that A, B, C, and D can do within each day, respectively.
Spoiler for

In Topic: The Best Performer

15 May 2013 - 12:52 AM



Anna (A), BIll (B), Cindy ©, and Dante (D) work on a project.

Together, A, B, and C can complete it in 10 days.

Together, B, C, and D can complete it in 11 days.

Together, C, D, and A can complete it in 12 days.

Together, D, A, and B can complete it in 13 days.

 

Who is the best performer?  Prove your answer.

 

Spoiler for

In Topic: Slicing a pizza a whole different way

13 May 2013 - 05:08 PM

 



Spoiler for

          

 

Spoiler for So you are saying that

 

Correct. The star awaits the formula. ;)

 

 

Recursive formula

Spoiler for