Javascript Disabled Detected

You currently have javascript disabled. Several functions may not work. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality.

Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum

Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account.
As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends.

Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games.

If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top.
If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen.

Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)

Guest Message by DevFuse

bonanova

Member Since --
Offline Last Active Yesterday, 12:04 PM

Find content

Community Stats

Group Moderator
Active Posts 4786
Profile Views 5754
Member Title bonanova
Age Age Unknown
Birthday November 3

Gender
Male
Location
New York
Interests
Music [performing and directing], photography.

Friends

Latest Visitors

tammie
09 May 2013 - 14:12
superprismatic
08 May 2013 - 01:54
vigmeister
06 May 2013 - 18:50
jhawk
01 May 2013 - 12:39
Yodell
24 Apr 2013 - 15:58

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Ridiculous Inverse

Yesterday, 11:56 AM

There are a few functions that are their own inverses. 1/x (away from 0) is one instance.
For tiebreaker are you asking for other instances of functions for which f[f(x)]= x?
Or for more functions whose inverses are their reciprocals?

In Topic: Coin Triplets

22 May 2013 - 12:00 PM

Spoiler for Looks like

Player 1 picks a triplet T₁.

Player 2 picks a triplet T₂.

Coin is tossed until T₁ or T₂ appears and wins.

Every triplet T₁ has an evil twin T₂ that will beat it on average.

Suppose T₁ = TTT.

If TTT is not the result of the first three flips, it will be preceded by H and lose to HTT.

TTT is the result of the first three flips 1/8 of the time.

Thus TTT loses to HTT with 7:1 odds.

Other pairwise triplet probabilities can be deduced similarly.
The table gives P₂'s winning probability for every triplet combination T₁, T₂.
The bottom two rows give the best and average winning probability for each T₁

What is the optimal strategy for each player?

P₁ should pick T₁= HTH, HTT, THH or THT.
The best that P2 can achieve then is a winning probability of .667,

That is the smallest best winning probability among the possible T₁ choices.

P₂ should look in the column headed by T₁ and choose the T₂ that has the highest winning probability.

With best play, who is most likely to win?

P₂ can always gain favorable odds, ranging from 2:1 to 7:1 depending on T₁

Suppose the triplets were chosen in secret?

I interpret this to mean P2 chooses T₂ without knowing T₁.

Nothing different for P₁. He should still choose HTH, HTT, THH or THT.

P₂ does not know T₁, so he should seek the T₂ with best average winning probability.
These numbers are given in the last column of the table.

The choices are either HTT or THH with average winning probability of .507.

HTT loses only to HHT; draws against itself, HTH, THH and THT; wins against HHH, TTH and TTT.
THH loses only to TTH; draws against itself, THT, HTT and HTH; wins against TTT, HHT and HHH.

What would be the optimal strategy against a randomly selected triplet?

I take this to ask P₁'s optimal strategy in the case that T2 will be chosen at random.

P₁ should look at the bottom row of the table to see P₂'s winning probability averaged over all the T2s.

P₁ should thus choose HTT or THH.

This gives T₂ the lowest average winning probability: .368.

P2\P1| HHH HHT HTH HTT THH THT TTH TTT | MAX | AVG |
---\-+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
HHH | --- .500 .400 .400 .125 .417 .300 .500 |.500 |.330 |
HHT |.500 ---   .667 .667 .250 .625 .500 .700 |.700 |.489 |
HTH |.600 .333   --- .500 .500 .500 .375 .583 |.600 |.424 |
HTT |.600 .333 .500   --- .500 .500 .750 .875 |.875 |.507 |
THH |.875 .750 .500 .500 --- .500 .333 .600 |.875 |.507 |
THT |.583 .375 .500 .500 .500 --- .333 .600 |.600 |.424 |
TTH |.700 .500 .625 .250 .667 .667 --- .500 |.700 |.489 |
TTT |.500 .300 .417 .125 .400 .400 .500   --- |.500 |.330 |
-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
MAX |.875 |.750 |.667 |.667 |.667 |.667 |.750 |.875 |
-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
AVG |.545 |.386 |.451 |.368 |.368 |.451 |.386 |.545 |
-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+

In Topic: Initial reactions - Lyrics

19 May 2013 - 01:10 PM

Spoiler for #1
Oh this is how it starts, lightning strikes the heart. It goes off like a gun, brighter than the sun. Oh we could beat the starts, faliing from the sky. Shining how we want, brighter than the sun. - Brighter Than the Sun.

Good one. One to go.

I'm amazed that #2 is the last one to be solved. I thought it would be first.

In Topic: Paper Scissors Rock

19 May 2013 - 01:00 PM

The OP does not say there is a third contest, but I can see how it's implied.
"In a row" is redundant if not.

In Topic: Connect-a-Gram

17 May 2013 - 04:14 AM

See OP. Identified answers already used.