Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum
|Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account.
As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends.
Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games.
If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top.
If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen.
Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
Posted 23 December 2007 - 01:44 AM
and whoever says that is most likely right
but I just find that a little hard to believe.
I mean, sure, there are millions of diffrent ways for a snowflake to look
but think of all the snow that has fallen on earth,
I mean, you think that two snowflakes, from anywhere on earth, would look exactly (and I use the word exactly very loosely) the same.
Posted 23 December 2007 - 01:45 AM
Posted 23 December 2007 - 02:04 AM
on the other hand...
"Is it true that no two snowflakes are identical?
Yes and no. No two snowflakes are exactly identical, down to the precise number of water molecules, spin of electrons, isotope abundance of hydrogen and oxygen, etc. On the other hand, it is possible for two snowflakes to look exactly alike and any given snowflake probably has had a good match at some point in history. Since so many factors affect the structure of a snowflake and since a snowflake's structure is constantly changing in response to environmental conditions, it is improbable that anyone would see two identical snowflakes. "
Posted 23 December 2007 - 02:10 AM
luv the warriors books, by the way...
but now it's time for me to correct myself yet again
Now, I'm just gonna say I'm sorta right, cuz, like I said, I used the word "exactly" very loosely
but when you use it less loosely, you find yourself in a whole new situation
now, I only sorta skimmed, but there was a physicion guy who went more deeply into it.
and it's not really about seeing every snowflake, but about the science of it all...
I dunno, they said stuff about how some water molecules that occur naturally have a different type of atom, (can't remember which) in place of one of the hydrogen atoms...
I don't really wanna go into deep explanation right now, I'm kinda tired
but it's actually EXTREMELY unlikely
I'm gonna start doin my research BEFORE I post something here...
Posted 06 February 2008 - 10:46 PM
All the maths and physics is very wrong as although i do AS in them i am not very good at all. Although no-one questions my chemistry
Thanks for reading
Posted 07 February 2008 - 06:34 PM
Most naturally occuring water molecules have oxygen atoms of O14 I think. (I read this stuff a long time ago)
But one out of 500 have oxygen atoms of O16
And sometimes one of the hydrogen atoms is replaced by... something else.
That adds to the unlikelines of it, but I still think it doesn't need that help because it's so unlikely
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users