Jump to content


Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum

Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account.
As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends.

Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games.

If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top.
If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen.

Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
Guest Message by DevFuse
 

Photo
- - - - -

Island Baal


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
27 replies to this topic

#11 Puzzlerz

Puzzlerz

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 05 December 2007 - 05:23 AM

Since they must only lie or only tell the truth, this is an impossible statement, a paradox.
Using your logic that A is a liar, when A says B is a lying monkey, then B must be a truthful human. Then B would be lying to say A is telling truth. No solution.

A correctly stated puzzle would be for A to say, "B is a truthful monkey. I am human."
Then, A is a lying monkey; and B is a lying human.
  • 0

#12 rookie1ja

rookie1ja

    Senior Member

  • Site Admin
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1341 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Slovakia

Posted 05 December 2007 - 11:27 AM

Using your logic that A is a liar, when A says B is a lying monkey, then B must be a truthful human.


nope, if "B is a lying monkey" is a lie ... then the truth is that:
1. B is a truth telling monkey OR
2. B is a lying human (anything but monkey) OR
3. B is a truth telling human
... any of the 3 options can be true

eg. when you lie that you drank 2 beers last night, actually, you could still have had 1 (or 10)
  • 0

rookie1ja (site admin)
Optical Illusions
Support BrainDen

"To start: Press any key... Where's the 'any' key?" - Homer Simpson


#13 sraavani

sraavani

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 02 January 2008 - 11:37 AM

A is a Monkey and B is a Human.
  • 0

#14 trojan2k8

trojan2k8

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 26 posts

Posted 19 March 2008 - 05:53 PM

IF B is truth then they would both be humans becuase B says A is telling the truth so
B=liar/monkey
A=Human/truth
  • 0

#15 i_love_brain_teasers

i_love_brain_teasers

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 20 March 2008 - 02:16 AM

this one comfuses me i dont get it o_O

Edited by i_love_brain_teasers, 20 March 2008 - 02:18 AM.

  • 0

#16 NymphCRF250

NymphCRF250

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 15 posts

Posted 20 March 2008 - 06:17 PM

My question is if A is a monkey, then how did he tell us that he is a man and b is a lying monkey in the first place? I think we have other problems here.
  • 0

#17 lulu1221

lulu1221

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 38 posts

Posted 22 March 2008 - 09:01 PM

I HATE MONKEYS!!! THIS ONE WAS REALLY GOOD THOUGH. ;)
  • 0

#18 hopstop

hopstop

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 19 posts

Posted 27 March 2008 - 10:16 AM

both liars ?
  • 0

#19 Rockzilla

Rockzilla

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 11 April 2008 - 02:06 AM

They are both liars, hopefully.
  • 0

#20 tc24

tc24

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 14 April 2008 - 06:00 PM

I am not a big fan of this one. The answer chooses to divide the statements. If the whole statement that A makes is a lie, then, it can be because of the first part of the statement where A says that B is a lying monkey, or like the answer assumes, due to both statements being a lie, or the first part can be the truth (which cannot be because of the statement of B) and the second part could be a lie. I think A could be a monkey or a human.

A says: B is monkey and B lies and A is human.
B says: A is telling the truth.

A lies of B is human, or if B tells the truth, or if A is not human.

The answer divides the first statement and concludes that B is a human and B lies, which is fine, but then goes on to say that A is a monkey because A lies. However, A is already lying because of the first part of the statement, therefore doesn't necessarily have to lie about the latter part. A is not lying about the part that B lies either.

If there was a point in the question that said that every sentence is a lie, then the answer would have worked.

t
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users