## Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum

Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account. As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends. Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games. If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top. If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen. Thanks and enjoy the Den :-) |

# Father and Son

### #1

Posted 27 September 2007 - 01:36 PM

### #2

Posted 27 September 2007 - 01:53 PM

### #3

Posted 27 September 2007 - 04:14 PM

Okay, that's not what you were looking for - but that's what this forum is all about: finding new ways to look at things.

### #4

Posted 27 September 2007 - 09:02 PM

### #5

Posted 28 September 2007 - 05:24 AM

b : the son's age.

so, it says:

1.a+b = 66

2.a =

*k*b (

*k*is a constant)

put second statement to first.

=> b = 66/(

*(k+1)*)

since it doesn't say k needs to be Nature number.

therefore, b can be any number in between 0 to 50.

PS:

1. It is possible that the father is youger than the son. For example,

a man married with a woman who has a son and the son is older than the man.

2. At least, the father needs to be older enough to get married.

### #6

Posted 28 September 2007 - 06:24 AM

Loosely, perhaps, but not precisely:a : the father's age.

b : the son's age.

so, it says:

1.a+b = 66

2.a =kb (kis a constant)

put second statement to first.

=> b = 66/((k+1))

since it doesn't say k needs to be Nature number.

therefore, b can be any number in between 0 to 50.

PS:

1. It is possible that the father is youger than the son. For example,

a man married with a woman who has a son and the son is older than the man.

2. At least, the father needs to be older enough to get married.

[1] The problem said

**multiple**. That usually means k is not only a constant, but also an integer.

[2] That would be step-father and step-son.

*Vidi vici veni.*

### #7

Posted 28 September 2007 - 06:35 AM

Loosely, perhaps, but not precisely:

[1] The problem said multiple. That usually means k is not only a constant, but also an integer.

That "usually" is also loosely, perhaps, but not precisely.

Therefore, the precisely answer would be 0 < b <= 28. (boy starts youthhood.

### #8

Posted 28 September 2007 - 06:44 AM

If multiple does not mean integral multiple, the statement gives no information.

Every pair of ages, otherwise, could be described as multiples.

So if you reject that as precise, let's affirm it for all practical purposes.

*Vidi vici veni.*

### #9

Posted 28 September 2007 - 07:24 AM

OP states .... Furthermore, the father's age is a multiple of the son's age.

If multiple does not mean integral multiple, the statement gives no information.

Every pair of ages, otherwise, could be described as multiples.

So if you reject that as precise, let's affirm it for all practical purposes.

1. You cannot ask a "puzzle question" to be "precised".

2. Furthermore, if father's age is 46 years old and son's age is 20 years old, the father's age is a multiple of the son's age when we "precisely" count the age into minutes or seconds. Therefore, besides the father is older enough to give a birth, the son could be 10, 12, 16, 20 or other normal ages.

### #10

Posted 28 September 2007 - 07:37 AM

OP states .... Furthermore, the father's age is a multiple of the son's age.

If multiple does not mean integral multiple, the statement gives no information.

Every pair of ages, otherwise, could be described as multiples.

So if you reject that as precise, let's affirm it for all practical purposes.

1. You cannot ask a "puzzle question" to be "precised".

2. Furthermore, if father's age is 46 years old and son's age is 20 years old, the father's age is a multiple of the son's age when we "precisely" count the age into minutes or seconds. Therefore, besides the father is older enough to give a birth, the son could be 10, 12, 16, 20 or other normal ages.

Nope, nope, and ... nope.

Not unless you assume the question asks the ages in those units for which the multiples are integral -- minutes, seconds.

You obviously did not assume that -- years are the only units mentioned in your answer.

You're dancing around the issue pretty well, but you're running out of places to hide.

Precision or looseness aside, it's nice to be consistent.

*Vidi vici veni.*

#### 0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users