Jump to content


Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum

Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account.
As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends.

Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games.

If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top.
If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen.

Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
Guest Message by DevFuse
 

Photo
- - - - -

Number puzzle


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 brhan

brhan

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 466 posts

Posted 21 September 2007 - 01:13 PM

Put the numbers from 1 to 14 into the square, such that no consecutive numbers (eg. 2 and 3) and consecutive parity numbers (e.g 2 and 4) touch (common edge or point).

numberPazzle.gif

Spoiler for Solution

  • 0

#2 Writersblock

Writersblock

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 597 posts

Posted 21 September 2007 - 08:04 PM

nice
  • 0

#3 c16ram

c16ram

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 22 September 2007 - 01:17 PM


4 12 6 3
11 7 2 9 14 8
10 13 5 1
  • 0

#4 brhan

brhan

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 466 posts

Posted 22 September 2007 - 02:56 PM


.. 4 12 6 3
11 7 2 9 14 8
.. 10 13 5 1



That is not correct. 4 and 2 are connected through a diagonal. The same reasoning with 10 and 11.
  • 0

#5 bonanova

bonanova

    bonanova

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5714 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York

Posted 23 September 2007 - 05:22 AM

If I understand the "parity" constraint, the idea is to keep neighbors from being nearest or next-nearest in value.
Neighboring numbers must differ by 3 or more in value.

I broke the problem down this way.
Spoiler for ...

  • 0
The greatest challenge to any thinker is stating the problem in a way that will allow a solution.
- Bertrand Russell

#6 brhan

brhan

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 466 posts

Posted 24 September 2007 - 04:50 PM

If I understand the "parity" constraint, the idea is to keep neighbors from being nearest or next-nearest in value.
Neighboring numbers must differ by 3 or more in value.



Exactly ...
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users