## Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum

 Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account. As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends. Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games. If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top. If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen. Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
Guest Message by DevFuse

38 replies to this topic

### #1 bonanova

bonanova

bonanova

• Moderator
• 6144 posts
• Gender:Male
• Location:New York

Posted 19 September 2007 - 09:42 AM

Considering only positive integers, 7 is unambiguously specified by the phrase the smallest number not specifiable using fewer than two syllables.

What is the smallest number not specifiable using fewer than twenty-three syllables?

Spoiler for Hint

• 0

Vidi vici veni.

### #2 Writersblock

Writersblock

Senior Member

• Members
• 597 posts

Posted 19 September 2007 - 10:31 PM

Possible
Using your prompt, 7,777,777 would make sense.
• 0

### #3 Scraff

Scraff

• Members
• 287 posts

Posted 19 September 2007 - 10:45 PM

What does 'not specifiable' mean? Seven has two syllables. Eight has one. I'm obviously not getting something.
• 0

### #4 unreality

unreality

Senior Member

• Members
• 6375 posts

Posted 20 September 2007 - 12:00 AM

"se-ven" is the only one digit number with more than one syllable... so you'll get more syllable per smaller number, so to speak
• 0

### #5 Scraff

Scraff

• Members
• 287 posts

Posted 20 September 2007 - 12:14 AM

Possible
Using your prompt, 7,777,777 would make sense.

That has 24 syllables. 7,777,778 has 23. One trillion one has 4 syllables. I'm not gettin' it.
• 0

### #6 unreality

unreality

Senior Member

• Members
• 6375 posts

Posted 20 September 2007 - 12:31 AM

this should clear it up:

the smallest number

we want the smallest number thats 23 syllables... so it would be 777,777,778 or whatever you said.
• 0

### #7 Ploper

Ploper

Senior Member

• Members
• 579 posts

Posted 20 September 2007 - 01:08 AM

OH MY GOD!

23!
2/3 equals 0.666!
• 0

### #8 Scraff

Scraff

• Members
• 287 posts

Posted 20 September 2007 - 03:15 AM

we want the smallest number thats 23 syllables

No, we don't. We want "the smallest number not specifiable (whatever that means) using fewer than twenty-three syllables".
• 0

### #9 Writersblock

Writersblock

Senior Member

• Members
• 597 posts

Posted 20 September 2007 - 05:39 AM

Exactly.

What is the smallest number not specifiable using fewer than twenty-three syllables

It's written kind of ambigously, but it means that the number must be:
specifiable
using MORE than 23 syllables and no less
the smallest such number to fit the definition

and from the prompt

Considering only positive integers

It must be a positive integer.

EDIT:

Even as I wrote this, I disagreed with myself.

not specifiable using fewer than twenty-three syllables

This would allow 23 syllables and therefore it would be 7,777,771.
• 0

### #10 Scraff

Scraff

• Members
• 287 posts

Posted 20 September 2007 - 02:04 PM

It's written kind of ambigously, but it means that the number must be:
specifiable

The OP said, "not specifiable". And I still don't know what that means.

not specifiable using fewer than twenty-three syllables

This would allow 23 syllables and therefore it would be 7,777,771.

You're saying 23 is less than 23? 1 is less than 23. I think that would make the answer: 1. Although I'm not sure if the 'not specifiable' part cahanges the answer.
• 0

#### 0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users