Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum
|Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account.
As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends.
Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games.
If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top.
If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen.
Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
Posted 24 August 2007 - 06:42 AM
So here is my question to you all:
When does a word take on meaning, and how can you prove it?
Some definitions. The word may be written or spoken. The "giver" and "receiver" must speak the same language, except as a way to offer proof. *hint hint*
I'll be away for a few days, so I'll let this one stew.
Posted 24 August 2007 - 08:42 PM
The meaning of words is a mixture of the "dictionary meaning" and the personal experience of the speaker and listener. The latter component of meaning leads at times to misunderstanding until the context is communicated and understood. Culture and environment can alter generic meanings of words.
How can we prove a word has a meaning? One approach might be to agree on a common dictionary as the authority. A more pragmatic approach might be to say that if two people are comfortable with the notion that they agree when they discuss something, then the words they used to reach agreement themselves have an agreed meaning.
Is this what you had in mind?
Vidi vici veni.
Posted 24 August 2007 - 11:14 PM
A concept appears in the giver's mind. She then speaks or writes a word. That is then read or heard by someone who interprets the word into a concept.
At what point along this chain of events does the concept "become" communication? What matters most in this chain of events for communication to happen?
Posted 25 August 2007 - 02:35 AM
That part matters most.
interprets the word into a concept.
Vidi vici veni.
Posted 30 August 2007 - 09:30 PM
concepts = most important part
Posted 01 September 2007 - 03:46 PM
Well like many things proof is less significant than is our agreement with regard to premises.
Most of us can make a valid logical argument from a premise to a conclusion.
We might debate a conclusion, but not because of possibly flawed logic,
rather because we don't share common premises.
Visit the one boy one girl thread for a demonstration of that thought.
I would hold that "meaning" in your original question is bound up
with the notion of sharing a thought with you by means of using
words that carry meaning held substantially in common.
That said, my statement would seem to follow: when the commonly
understood word is translated to a concept by you, then its meaning
has achieved significance because it has accomplished something.
And, as I stated above, that doesn't prove my statement, it only
reveals the premise behind it....
Vidi vici veni.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users