Edited by fisk88, 14 June 2008 - 10:40 PM.
Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum
|Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account.
As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends.
Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games.
If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top.
If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen.
Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
Posted 23 June 2008 - 05:36 PM
I am not good at explaining things so I have to draw it out.
60 mph 30mph
If both trains were going the same speed they would meet in the exact middle. But since the train from Boston was going twice as fast as the train from New York it would have gone 3/4 of the way and the NYTrain would have gone 1/4 of the way.And the NyTrain's behind was closer to its station.
That's just how I figure it.
Posted 10 July 2008 - 12:11 AM
Posted 28 July 2008 - 05:52 PM
Posted 27 October 2008 - 04:43 PM
Posted 05 November 2008 - 02:49 AM
Trains - Back to the Logic Puzzles
A train leaves New York for Boston. Five minutes later another train leaves Boston for New York, at double the speed. Which train will be closer to New York when they encounter?Spoiler for Solution
The one that left New York because when they "encounter," they will be at the same point, but the caboose of the train leaving New York will be the closest point to New York...
Posted 17 November 2008 - 01:39 PM
Posted 28 November 2008 - 12:01 AM
In other words, if you reduce a train to a point, which you have to do in order to define 'encounter', then you should also use this point in your definition of 'distance to'.
Of course, then both trains will be at exactly the same distance to New York.
I hope this settles your argument here.
Posted 17 October 2009 - 08:41 AM
Posted 11 May 2010 - 10:49 PM
I Love it....
Alrighty,,, I'm going to try to explain this one last time... WHY? I don't know, just for the shear fun of seeing how many of you will STILL NOT GET IT....
THE QUESTION IS A SHAM... IT DOES NOT MATTER THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE POINTS. LOOK AT IT LIKE THIS. LETS SAY YOU ARE AT ONE END OF YOUR STREET, WE WILL CALL YOUR SIDE "SIDE-A" AND I AM AT THE OTHER "SIDE-B". WE ARE BOTH ON BICYCLES. WE START HEADING TOWARD EACHOTHER. ONE IS TRAVELING FASTER THAN THE OTHER, BUT YOU DO NOT KNOW WHICH ONE. "WHEN WE SMACK INTO EACHOTHER, WHO IS CLOSER TO SIDE "A"??? your focusing on the fact that it is impossible to calculate the distance if you do not have more information, which is obvious. It WOULD be impossible to calculate unless you knew how fast they were going, and the distances between the two, HOWEVER......That's not the case....
THE ANSWER IS """""WE ARE AT THE SAME POINT BECAUSE WE JUST SMACKED INTO EACHOTHER""" NEITHER IS CLOSER, WE ARE AT THE SAME POINT. I MEAN, YOU COULD ARGUE IT SAYING THAT THE BACK OF YOUR HEAD IS CLOSER, BUT COME ON... THE POINT IS THAT THE DISTANCE/TIME RATIO DOES NOT MATTER IF THE 2 TRAINS SMACK INTO EACHOTHER. AT THAT POINT, THEY ARE THE SAME DISTANCE FROM BOTH SIDES....
I THINK I explained it well,,,, I dunno
haha well said
i already knew this one, but thats very well explained!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users