Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum
|Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account.
As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends.
Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games.
If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top.
If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen.
Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
What is better - eternal bliss or a simple bread?
Posted 17 April 2009 - 09:58 PM
Posted 18 April 2009 - 03:08 AM
This is like something i learned in Geometry. If A<B and B<C then A<C, it has a name but i don't remember it
But that is not what is going on here.
Eternal_Bliss < Nothing (Nothing better than Eternal Bliss)
and Nothing < Slice_of_Bread (Slice of Bread better than Nothing)
then Eternal_Bliss < Slice_of_Bread. (Slice of Bread better than Eternal Bliss)
The error is one of Equivocation; the two instances of "Nothing" do not mean exactly the same thing.
Posted 11 May 2009 - 10:41 PM
if you were to use the same definition on the bread, than nothing could be the same as bread or better. just not eternal bliss
Posted 12 May 2009 - 12:25 AM
God is love.
Love is blind
Stevie Wonder is blind.
Stevie Wonder is God.
Time waits for no man.
No man is an island.
Time waits for an island.
Posted 12 May 2009 - 01:39 AM
anyway i agree with the previous post that says it's really a matter of opinion.
Edited by No1slight, 12 May 2009 - 01:40 AM.
Posted 21 June 2009 - 05:53 AM
nothing is better than eternal bliss, meaning that anything you could compare would not be better
bread better than nothing, meaning that having bread is better than having nothing
so to clarify this
eternal bliss can not be compared, and if all you have is bread, be happy because you could have nothing
Posted 07 July 2009 - 11:41 PM
Posted 12 December 2009 - 07:13 PM
Posted 08 March 2010 - 05:23 AM
The way you guys are thinking about it is having both instances of nothing mean the same thing, when they don't (unless you're a smartass).
Posted 11 March 2010 - 06:16 PM
So if you are spiritual: Depending on the bread, bread could mean eternal bliss. So, not taking the bread could be death of the soul.
Non religious view.
We all will experiance death. Bread is a choice and death is not. Death greets us all. (sooner or later) Death is an absolute.
So, on both religous and non religous terms my choice would be the bread.
Edited by PhoenixFromTheFlames, 11 March 2010 - 06:24 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users