Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum
![]() |
Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account. As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends. Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games. If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top. If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen. Thanks and enjoy the Den :-) |
What is better - eternal bliss or a simple bread?
#1
Posted 09 June 2007 - 01:01 PM
What is better than eternal bliss? Nothing. But a slice of bread is better than nothing. So slice of bread is more than eternal bliss.
rookie1ja (site admin)
Optical Illusions
Support BrainDen
"To start: Press any key... Where's the 'any' key?" - Homer Simpson
#2
Posted 12 June 2007 - 02:34 AM
What is better - eternal bliss or a simple bread? - Back to the Paradoxes
What is better than eternal bliss? Nothing. But a slice of bread is better than nothing. So slice of bread is more than eternal bliss.
This one is fun.
I think that as stated the thing that leads to a paradox is that "bread is better than nothing". Bread is 'good' but it isn't better than nothing. Things can be 'nuetral', 'good' and 'better' and "nothing" is not a thing.
#3
Posted 25 June 2007 - 12:26 PM
and since "eternal bliss" is also good
=>eternal bliss better than nothing
2. what's better than eternal bliss? nothing.
=> nothing better than eternal bliss
therefore u see st8ment 1 and 2 lead to a paradox
#4
Posted 25 June 2007 - 12:51 PM
so BREAD is better than Bliss
#5
Posted 26 June 2007 - 03:14 AM
Null is preferable to X
0+1 is preferable to 0
ergo 0+1 is preferable to null
Zero and one can be ranked because they have relative value. Null can't be ranked since it's valueless. This is a paradox because people confuse zero with null; zero is a value while null is an absence of value.
#6
Posted 29 June 2007 - 10:10 AM
Isn't this moreso a case of zero versus null?
Null is preferable to X
0+1 is preferable to 0
ergo 0+1 is preferable to null
Zero and one can be ranked because they have relative value. Null can't be ranked since it's valueless. This is a paradox because people confuse zero with null; zero is a value while null is an absence of value.
Yeah, that's along the lines of what I am saying. Bread is not better than nothing because nothing is null and things can't be compared to null.
#7
Posted 02 July 2007 - 07:27 AM
"No cat has eight tails.
Every cat has one tail more than no cat.
Therefore, every cat has nine tails".
#8
Posted 03 July 2007 - 02:32 AM
#9
Posted 06 July 2007 - 11:30 AM
0= Nothing
0.001= Bread (better than nothing)
Eternal bliss is the winner.
#10
Posted 06 July 2007 - 04:42 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






