bahahaha so true
Humph, the government does that all the time...
Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum
|Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account.
As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends.
Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games.
If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top.
If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen.
Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
Is it possible to give what we don't have?
Posted 25 November 2008 - 02:03 PM
Posted 06 December 2008 - 02:50 AM
No and yes, it all depenting on the sitsuation.
A simple anwer: no.
Edited by speed, 06 December 2008 - 02:51 AM.
Posted 01 January 2009 - 04:35 AM
Please define"gives his cash with sorrow". I'll restate it. Gives his cash WHILE FEELING SORROW. no paradox.
Posted 02 March 2009 - 04:45 PM
1. He only gave cash, if he gave both, the receiver must be the one with sorrow and not him.
2. He didn't have sorrow because he was happy with the situation that he had the money. When he gave the money, he became sorrowful not because he gained sorrow but because he lost happiness. Sorrow is not the replacement of happiness but rather the absence of happiness.
3. So the story was a fallacy, because what he gave was "cash" and the "happiness that is attached to the cash" that's why the recipient must have felt "happy" because of the "cash". He on the other hand lost "cash", and lost "happiness" thus with the absence of "happiness" felt "sorrow".
My two cents' worth...
Posted 22 May 2009 - 06:55 PM
Posted 24 March 2010 - 09:53 PM
Posted 25 March 2010 - 09:09 PM
if you are rich you have plenty. it is possible to give what you dont have. you can give nothing.
Posted 13 May 2010 - 10:16 PM
But if you wanted to entertain the idea that he could actully pass along sorrow with the csh...
"...he doesn't have the cash with sorrow, so he gives what he doesn't have."
This is not true.
Having the sorrow is like HAVING an idea. The sorrow is a condition generated by the act of giving away his money. Thus, when he gives away his money he aquires sorrow and is free to do what he wants with it.
Posted 01 August 2010 - 03:30 PM
Is it possible to give what we don't have? - Back to the Paradoxes
Sophist: "Yes. Greedy man gives his cash with sorrow. However, he doesn't have the cash with sorrow, so he gives what he doesn't have."
focusing on the question, here are some real life situations to answer the question.
So basically, the answer is:
Yes, so long as it is not a physical object. Unless #3 counts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users