This question might be related to the four-legged stool. Or not.

Draw a simple (no crossings) closed (not necessarily convex) curve on a sheet of paper.

Can you always find four points on the curve that form the four vertices of a square?

Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account. As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends. Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games. If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top. If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen. Thanks and enjoy the Den :-) |

Guest Message by DevFuse

Started by bonanova, Jun 01 2014 06:51 AM

3 replies to this topic

Posted 01 June 2014 - 06:51 AM

This question might be related to the four-legged stool. Or not.

Draw a simple (no crossings) closed (not necessarily convex) curve on a sheet of paper.

Can you always find four points on the curve that form the four vertices of a square?

*Vidi vici veni.*

Posted 02 June 2014 - 09:52 AM

Spoiler for

Posted 02 June 2014 - 01:00 PM

Informally, the proof is to take a square and let 2 opposite corner A and C run around the loop. Doing that, you rotate the square while trying to fit the 2 other corners B and D within the loop. If you start with A and C on a horizontal line, and B and D can fit within the loop, then after 1/4 turn, A and C are on a vertical line, where BD originally was and now B and D are outside of the loop.

So, at some point (for some angle between AC and the horizontal), you go from "B and D both fit in the loop" to "B and D fit outside the loop". At that point, it should be possible to fit both B and D on the loop.

There are plenty of loose ends, but it makes me feel such a square must exist.

Posted 02 June 2014 - 03:37 PM

It's probably better to define a rhombus for each direction:

Spoiler for

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users