Jump to content


Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum

Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account.
As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends.

Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games.

If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top.
If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen.

Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
Guest Message by DevFuse
 

Photo
- - - - -

Twins


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
108 replies to this topic

#81 Shereen

Shereen

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 09 March 2008 - 09:46 AM

They might have a third sister/brother born with them at the same time..which makes them not twins.
  • 0

#82 jojello

jojello

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 09 March 2008 - 01:49 PM

maybe when u say they were born at the same time...One was born at 1 in the morning and the other was born at 1 in the afternoon??
  • 0

#83 joaopsr

joaopsr

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 19 posts

Posted 12 March 2008 - 03:54 PM

Easy! The woman was impregnated by two different men.


I believe that's impossible in humans... it can happen with cats though... :D
  • 0

#84 Jordanmax

Jordanmax

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 68 posts

Posted 13 March 2008 - 03:00 AM

Twins - Back to the Logic Puzzles
Two girls are born to the same mother, on the same day, at the same time (Edit: of course, not both at once - one right after the other - you know what I mean ;) ), in the same month and year and yet they're not twins. How can this be?


Spoiler for Solution

There are more than 2 babies
  • 0

#85 elderw

elderw

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 28 posts

Posted 19 March 2008 - 05:58 PM

they're conjoined twinz they are techically they are not twins then
  • 0

#86 tink

tink

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 63 posts

Posted 20 March 2008 - 03:00 AM

are they triplets
  • 0

#87 Bije

Bije

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 22 March 2008 - 02:17 AM

maybe the mom had 2 girls and 1 boy or more...they may be triples of something
  • 0

#88 Drakontas

Drakontas

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 03 April 2008 - 04:40 AM

They are triplets.
  • 0

#89 dawgsrule93

dawgsrule93

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 46 posts

Posted 04 April 2008 - 02:16 AM

Is it because the are a part of triplets, not twins?
  • 0

#90 skirider

skirider

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 44 posts

Posted 13 April 2008 - 05:48 AM

couldnt they be a rare quadruplet?
  • 0




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users