Jump to content


Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum

Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account.
As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends.

Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games.

If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top.
If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen.

Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
Guest Message by DevFuse
 

Photo
- - - - -

Dentist's agree


Best Answer bonanova, 04 May 2014 - 09:18 AM

Spoiler for With some assumptions

Go to the full post


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 BMAD

BMAD

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1658 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 28 April 2014 - 01:20 AM

Ten out of 17 people suffer from plaque buildup, but Four out of five dentist agree that the new BMAD formula for mouth rinse will cure 95% of the people with gingivitis of plaque build up and is 85% effective for those who do not have gingivitis.  If a random person is selected what is the probability they would be effectively treated of plaque buildup?


  • 0

#2 bonanova

bonanova

    bonanova

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5565 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York

Posted 28 April 2014 - 08:52 AM

Do we know the prior probability of having gingivitis?


  • 0
The greatest challenge to any thinker is stating the problem in a way that will allow a solution.
- Bertrand Russell

#3 BMAD

BMAD

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1658 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 28 April 2014 - 02:06 PM

Oh. assume 50 50 chance


  • 0

#4 m00li

m00li

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 71 posts

Posted 28 April 2014 - 08:46 PM

I think it also depends on what the remaining fifth of dentists think too. e.g. they might think that the BMAD formula is effective on 100% of plaque buildups (case A extreme) or totally ineffective (case B extreme) whether a person has or doesn't have plaque buildup.

 

case A extreme:

probability that the person has plaque = P(has plaque) = 10/17

P(effectively treated) =

P(BMAD's formula behaves as 4/5 dentists predict)*[P(has gingivitis and is effectively treated) +P(doesnt have gingivitis and is eff. treated)] +

P(BMAD's formula behaves as 1/5 dentists predict)*[P(has gingivitis and is effectively treated) +P(doesnt have gingivitis and is eff. treated)] +

P(BMAD's formula doesnt behave as any of the dentist's predict)*[P(has gingivitis and is effectively treated) +P(doesnt have gingivitis and is eff. treated)]

 

Another Assumption (the last summand in the above sum is 0)

therefore, P(eff. treated)= 0.8(0.5*0.95 + 0.5*0.85) + 0.2(1) = 0.4(1.8) + 0.2 = 92%

 

case B extreme:

Under similar assumptions 

P(eff. treated)= 0.8(0.5*0.95 + 0.5*0.85) + 0.2(0) = 0.4(1.8) + 0.2 = 72%


  • 0

#5 bonanova

bonanova

    bonanova

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5565 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York

Posted 04 May 2014 - 09:18 AM   Best Answer

Spoiler for With some assumptions


  • 0
The greatest challenge to any thinker is stating the problem in a way that will allow a solution.
- Bertrand Russell




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users