## Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum

 Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account. As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends. Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games. If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top. If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen. Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
Guest Message by DevFuse

# No matter...whether Ascending or Descending order

Best Answer Pickett, 25 November 2013 - 02:35 PM

Spoiler for Small assumption...

Go to the full post

15 replies to this topic

### #11 Pickett

Pickett

Senior Member

• Members
• 545 posts
• Gender:Male
• Location:40°N 83°W +/-10'

Posted 25 November 2013 - 08:17 PM

But how can you be sure that it is exactly half? I mean there will some lost of precision due to estimation.

I'd say there's as much loss of precision as there is in pouring from one container to the other (there's always left over water in the original container...even if it's just drops)...

I fully admit that my method has a number of built in assumptions:

1. My original assumption that the beakers are perfect cylinders/rectangular prisms
2. The containers hold EXACTLY the number of gallons represented...not a drop more, nor less...(of course, this causes problems in that the second you MOVE a container to pour into another, you would lose some...unless you had an infinitely steady hand...)
3. You have a perfect eye and can tell the exact second the bottom corner is visible and stop pouring at exactly that time
4. I'm treating this as a purely mathematical problem...meaning I'm ignoring the surface tension of water, any distortion caused by the beakers in your reading, etc..

Definitely not a perfect answer, but I'd say you could get "close enough" with it...much closer than just guessing the amounts

• 0

Senior Member

• Members
• 1826 posts
• Gender:Female

Posted 25 November 2013 - 11:06 PM

Hmmm....creative
• 0

Senior Member

• Members
• 1826 posts
• Gender:Female

Posted 26 November 2013 - 03:50 AM

I like plainglazed's the best

• 0

### #14 phil1882

phil1882

Senior Member

• Members
• 557 posts

Posted 26 November 2013 - 11:00 PM

Spoiler for

• 0

### #15 wolfgang

wolfgang

Senior Member

• Members
• 783 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 27 November 2013 - 09:35 PM

Great!!

• 0

### #16 lubow91

lubow91

Newbie

• Members
• 1 posts

Posted 28 November 2013 - 06:11 AM

Pour D into B (5-4) so D=1 and B=4

C into A (5-2) so C=2 and A=3

Answer: D=1, C=2, A=3, B=4.

• 0

#### 0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users