Best Answer bushindo, 11 April 2013 - 04:52 PM

Calling Dr. Bayes ... Where is Bushindo when you need him?

Spoiler for the first toss

On the contrary, I will, on principle, plug the number in Bayes' formula =)

Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account. As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends. Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games. If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top. If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen. Thanks and enjoy the Den :-) |

Guest Message by DevFuse

Started by BMAD, Apr 11 2013 03:04 AM

Best Answer bushindo, 11 April 2013 - 04:52 PM

Calling Dr. Bayes ... Where is Bushindo when you need him?

Spoiler for the first toss

On the contrary, I will, on principle, plug the number in Bayes' formula =)

Spoiler for

Go to the full post
6 replies to this topic

Posted 11 April 2013 - 03:04 AM

Consider the following process. We have two coins, one of which is fair, and the other of which has heads on both sides. We give these two coins to our friend, who chooses one of them at random (each with probability 1/2). During the

rest of the process, she uses only the coin that she chose. She now proceeds to toss the coin many times, reporting the results. We consider this process to consist solely of what she reports to us.

Given that she reports a head on the *n*th toss, what is the probability that a head is thrown on the (*n *+ 1)st toss?

Now assume that the process is in state "heads" on both the (*n - *1)st and the *n*th toss. Find the probability that a head comes up on the (*n *+ 1)st toss.

Posted 11 April 2013 - 09:51 AM

Calling Dr. Bayes ... Where is Bushindo when you need him?

Spoiler for the first toss

*Vidi vici veni.*

Posted 11 April 2013 - 04:52 PM Best Answer

Calling Dr. Bayes ... Where is Bushindo when you need him?

Spoiler for the first toss

On the contrary, I will, on principle, plug the number in Bayes' formula =)

Spoiler for

Posted 11 April 2013 - 04:58 PM

Calling Dr. Bayes ... Where is Bushindo when you need him?

Spoiler for the first toss

I agree with your first answer, but not with your second...

Spoiler for

Posted 11 April 2013 - 05:16 PM

Yes. I think the three of us agree that I made a mistake in the second case.

I should say the four of us.

I should say the four of us.

*Vidi vici veni.*

Posted 13 April 2013 - 12:06 AM

Nice diagram.If you don't like Mr Bayes, you can draw a picture.

Now all you have to do is divide green by (green+red).

I actually get Bayes, and conditional probability (I think of it as "conditioned" probability.) And I had the right thinking and I had visualized the right numbers. And then I just wrote 5/6 when I should have written 4/5. My Bayesian aversion comes when the numbers are too large or the steps too complicated to visualize. And you just plug, plug, plug, and turn the crank. As an engineer I should love that. That's when the tool really shines. But it also robs me of the opportunity for the puzzle to shape my intuition. and that's part of my love for probability puzzles.

*Vidi vici veni.*

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users