Best Answer bushindo, 12 April 2013 - 02:43 AM

Spoiler for PROOF pt.3

I believe there is a subtle error here

Spoiler for

Go to the full post
Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account. As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends. Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games. If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top. If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen. Thanks and enjoy the Den :-) |

Guest Message by DevFuse

Started by BMAD, Apr 06 2013 03:30 AM

Best Answer bushindo, 12 April 2013 - 02:43 AM

Spoiler for PROOF pt.3

I believe there is a subtle error here

Spoiler for

Go to the full post
20 replies to this topic

Posted 06 June 2014 - 04:54 PM

I came across this page which seems to contradict my proof. Any ideas where I went wrong?

http://www2.stetson....friedma/maxmin/

Your proof did not go "wrong": 1.902 IS "greater than or equal to" sqrt(3).

What others have said is that 1.902 cannot be "equal to" sqrt(3).

As several people now have shown, the best lower bound for M/m is 1.902, where equality can be achieved.

*Vidi vici veni.*

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users