## Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum

 Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account. As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends. Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games. If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top. If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen. Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
Guest Message by DevFuse

# Greek Cross Dissections

Best Answer ParaLogic, 05 April 2013 - 02:53 AM

I think that's the best solution if you don't re-arrange any pieces until the end, but I didn't say you couldn't..?

I'll just share my solutions for #7 now, since this thread has passed on.

Spoiler for #7, no re-arranging (and no creativity)

Spoiler for #7, re-arranging (and creativity) allowed

Go to the full post

11 replies to this topic

### #1 ParaLogic

ParaLogic

Junior Member

• Members
• 22 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 18 March 2013 - 03:11 AM

It's been a looong time since I last visited this forum. (I forgot the username/password for my old account.) But now I'm capable of making my own puzzles (I hope)!

Find the minimum number of straight lines needed to cut a greek cross (example above) into pieces that can be re-assembled to make:

1. One square
2. Two congruent squares
3. Three congruent squares (I don't actually know the answer--or if it's even feasible--but maybe you'll surprise me!)
4. Four congruent squares
5. Five congruent squares (It's not quite as obvious as it looks!)
6. Four congruent greek crosses (I have a solution, but it's probably not optimal)
7. Five congruent greek crosses (Same as #6)

I'm fairly confident that I have the optimal solutions for 1, 2, 4, and 5. I just threw in the others for an extra challenge.

Spoiler for Note!

Edited by ParaLogic, 18 March 2013 - 03:13 AM.

• 0

### #2 bonanova

bonanova

bonanova

• Moderator
• 5887 posts
• Gender:Male
• Location:New York

Posted 18 March 2013 - 04:48 AM

Hi PL, it's nice to have you back!

If you remember your old username, we can probably fix it up for you to use again.

• 0
The greatest challenge to any thinker is stating the problem in a way that will allow a solution.
- Bertrand Russell

### #3 TimeSpaceLightForce

TimeSpaceLightForce

Senior Member

• Members
• 668 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 18 March 2013 - 01:08 PM

Spoiler for 1

• 1

### #4 bonanova

bonanova

bonanova

• Moderator
• 5887 posts
• Gender:Male
• Location:New York

Posted 19 March 2013 - 10:36 AM

Spoiler for 5

• 0
The greatest challenge to any thinker is stating the problem in a way that will allow a solution.
- Bertrand Russell

### #5 TimeSpaceLightForce

TimeSpaceLightForce

Senior Member

• Members
• 668 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 19 March 2013 - 06:01 PM

Spoiler for 4

• 1

### #6 TimeSpaceLightForce

TimeSpaceLightForce

Senior Member

• Members
• 668 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 19 March 2013 - 06:26 PM

Spoiler for 2

• 1

### #7 BobbyGo

BobbyGo

• Members
• 131 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 19 March 2013 - 09:13 PM

Spoiler for 5

• 0

### #8 TimeSpaceLightForce

TimeSpaceLightForce

Senior Member

• Members
• 668 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 21 March 2013 - 03:02 PM

Spoiler for 2cuts

• 0

### #9 ParaLogic

ParaLogic

Junior Member

• Members
• 22 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 22 March 2013 - 02:31 AM

Sorry for the long wait with no reply; I've been very busy recently.

@TSLF: Your answer to #1 is correct, although there are really an infinite number of solutions (to any of these) with the same number of cuts. And your second answer to #2 is also right. (Much simpler than your first, no? )

BobbyGo has the best solution for #5.

I should also add a clarification: I have not seen any solutions that require you to flip or even rotate the pieces (yet). I realized that if you are allowed to rotate the pieces, you can cut down (heh) the number of moves by using this in conjunction with the Note provided in the OP. For now, let's avoid anything other than translations.

That means that TSLF's answer to #4 is also good. I could do it with one fewer cut, but that would require some rotating.

After some consideration, I think I've found the best solutions for #6 and #7. There is an especially creative solution to #7 that I found while doodling on graph paper.

Spoiler for Hint for #8

Unfortunately, I doubt that there is such a neat solution to #3. If it were to be done, I don't think any of the cuts would line up with the grid lines provided in my example picture.

Edited by ParaLogic, 22 March 2013 - 02:36 AM.

• 0

### #10 ParaLogic

ParaLogic

Junior Member

• Members
• 22 posts
• Gender:Male

Posted 22 March 2013 - 02:42 AM

Spoiler for Hint for #8

I meant for #7 :

• 0

#### 0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users