Jump to content


Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum

Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account.
As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends.

Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games.

If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top.
If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen.

Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
Guest Message by DevFuse
 

Photo
- - - - -

A chessboard


Best Answer googon97, 17 March 2013 - 04:28 AM

Spoiler for Assuming it's not a trick question

Go to the full post


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 Utkrisht123

Utkrisht123

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 39 posts

Posted 16 March 2013 - 11:15 AM

Two diagonally opposite corner squares are removed from a regular chessboard. Now is it possible to cover all 62 squares with exactly 31 rectangles ( no rectangle should overlap each other ).

If yes then how? If no then why?


  • 0

#2 dark_magician_92

dark_magician_92

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 382 posts

Posted 16 March 2013 - 04:40 PM

Spoiler for


  • 0

#3 TimeSpaceLightForce

TimeSpaceLightForce

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 629 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 16 March 2013 - 05:23 PM

Two diagonally opposite corner squares are removed from a regular chessboard. Now is it possible to cover all 62 squares with exactly 31 rectangles ( no rectangle should overlap each other ).

If yes then how? If no then why?

Spoiler for


  • 0

#4 TimeSpaceLightForce

TimeSpaceLightForce

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 629 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 16 March 2013 - 05:47 PM

Spoiler for

 


  • 0

#5 googon97

googon97

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 21 posts

Posted 17 March 2013 - 04:28 AM   Best Answer

Spoiler for Assuming it's not a trick question


  • 0

#6 Utkrisht123

Utkrisht123

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 39 posts

Posted 17 March 2013 - 10:32 AM

Two diagonally opposite corner squares are removed from a regular chessboard. Now is it possible to cover all 62 squares with exactly 31 rectangles ( no rectangle should overlap each other ).

If yes then how? If no then why?

Spoiler for

Good point.

i didnt thought that way

But if I say that all rectangles should be completely aligned and should be of same size then what would you say.


  • 0

#7 Prime

Prime

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 872 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois, US

Posted 17 March 2013 - 10:01 PM

The stipulation that all 31 rectangles are “of the same size” is still a bit ambiguous. The size could be interpreted as area. If rectangles were equal that would imply they are equal in area (2 squares each) and dimensions. However, do we need a stipulation that rectangles must be alined on square boundaries?

If rectangle's dimensions were specified as 1x2, then the problem would be solved by googon97 in post #5.

But those rectangles could be 1/3 x 6, or 1/2 x 4. Still, it is impossible to cover up the board with 31 of those rectangles.

 

Furthermore, can we prove that we could or could not cover the board with 31 equal area (2 squares each) rectangles of any dimensions?


Edited by Prime, 17 March 2013 - 10:05 PM.

  • 0

Past prime, actually.


#8 Utkrisht123

Utkrisht123

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 39 posts

Posted 18 March 2013 - 08:20 AM

The stipulation that all 31 rectangles are “of the same size” is still a bit ambiguous. The size could be interpreted as area. If rectangles were equal that would imply they are equal in area (2 squares each) and dimensions. However, do we need a stipulation that rectangles must be alined on square boundaries?

If rectangle's dimensions were specified as 1x2, then the problem would be solved by googon97 in post #5.

But those rectangles could be 1/3 x 6, or 1/2 x 4. Still, it is impossible to cover up the board with 31 of those rectangles.

 

Furthermore, can we prove that we could or could not cover the board with 31 equal area (2 squares each) rectangles of any dimensions?  

If you want to then You are welcome to do so


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users