if you define the word definition, have you achieved anything? if you don't know what it means, defining the word doesn't help since you don't know what definition itself means. for example: dictionary.com defines definition as
Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum
|Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account.
As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends.
Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games.
If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top.
If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen.
Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
the defining defintion paradox
Posted 17 January 2013 - 02:41 AM
Posted 24 January 2013 - 10:17 AM
Maybe in linguistics some notions stand in the same place that axioms do in geometry and math: they're not derivable from the rest of the stuff. Define and definition might be one such notion. It does have synonyms, like describe, expose, clarify, that have more satisfactory dictionary meanings.
Define is what we say we're doing when we give the meaning of a word or idea. So the meaning of define has to come from some already agreed upon idea, or else, as you point out, it becomes a bit circular.
Vidi vici veni.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users