1368 replies to this topic

[curr3nt]

Since he was cooperating why would he expect the goodie to try to kill him instead of the baddie?

Kill a baddie, lynch the other and tie win simple as that.

[maurice]

A) he was lying
B) not the point. He was counting on someone else to do something...when he could have still determined things. Had a goodie actually killed a baddie and he didn't get his redirect, I would have volunteered to be lynched, so that we could kill or lynch the last baddie the next night and he redirect. Point is he shouldn't have redirected. We told him over and over again what would happen if he did.

[Molly Mae]

Nah, he got impatient. Once he redirected a 3rd time we had to lynch him. He counted on a goodie killing a baddie? Tsk, tsk. He knows better than that.

Yeah, I got impatient. But there is such a thing as being too careful in Mafia. And in many other things.

A) he was lying
B) not the point. He was counting on someone else to do something...when he could have still determined things. Had a goodie actually killed a baddie and he didn't get his redirect, I would have volunteered to be lynched, so that we could kill or lynch the last baddie the next night and he redirect. Point is he shouldn't have redirected. We told him over and over again what would happen if he did.

Can you point me to the post where a delay of the end was proposed? Other than your hesitation to believe that Aura was bad... =/

Regardless, this gives you motivation to lynch me. I understand that. What I don't understand is why Anon didn't go ahead with a RID kill on a baddie for a tie win...

[maurice]

Every post where I warned you against redirecting. Implied, no?

[Akriti]

Ah, now I really feel bad. Why have you made yourself a very clever personality, so that ppl would think that there may be some scheme, why is he doing that???

Sorry, forgive me.

[Akriti]

What I don't understand is why Anon didn't go ahead with a RID kill on a baddie for a tie win...

Anon didn't do so. It was I who didn't believe you and it was I who tried to kill you. Sorry!!

[curr3nt]

Akriti. Don't take us seriously we are just playing.

[Anon26]

I have mentioned earliar, and am still repeating:

1. Taz had no choice but to help the goodies, or he did have been lynch on D2.

2. Goodies aim was to achieve their wincon

3. Indies aim was to achieve his wincon.

4. Indies wincon was to the advantage of goodies (to an extent)

5. When Molly helped goodies, he was also fulfilling his wincon.

6. And hence, to see Molly win, after we goodies spared him on D2 on his promise to help, is a bit too absurd.

[Molly Mae]

Anon didn't do so. It was I who didn't believe you and it was I who tried to kill you. Sorry!!

No hard feelings. All's fair in Mafia and Mafia.

I have mentioned earliar, and am still repeating:

1. Taz had no choice but to help the goodies, or he did have been lynch on D2.

2. Goodies aim was to achieve their wincon

3. Indies aim was to achieve his wincon.

4. Indies wincon was to the advantage of goodies (to an extent)

5. When Molly helped goodies, he was also fulfilling his wincon.

6. And hence, to see Molly win, after we goodies spared him on D2 on his promise to help, is a bit too absurd.

1. Not true. Lynched D2 means I survive until D4 (I take two hits to die and can redirect a save to myself). N3 I could have allowed 2 RID kills to pass by publishing every Goodie ID I knew. With luck: N2 or N3 I could have seriously hurt the goodies by avoiding my redirects and allowing the baddies to kill. I get lynched D2 (all 5 baddies are alive). I still live. N3 is another 2 goodies dead, perhaps. It really depends on blocks/saves. 5 goodies dead with no saves, the baddies control the lynch with my support. I would have sacrificed my own win, but it wouldn't have really been any different. The only win I could hope for after being outed was a tie.

My only note is against number 6. If you had lynched me D2, the goodies would have lost. You would have been in the dark about the baddies (information I shared after the lynch eased over to Medji). They had two RID kills and 4 outed goodies to target. I also would have been alive N3 (two hits to die) to mess the goodies up good.

Edited by Molly Mae, 08 July 2011 - 08:17 PM.

[Anon26]

Ok I change my statement a bit.

I earliar mentioned, we spared you on D2.

Actually to spare you, it was for the good of goodies.
Your wincon was to goodies favour.
So we could have used the earliar part of your wincon, and dump you, when you get too close.

Goodies would never go for you, in D2. You were a protection. A meat shield.
Had you helped baddies, you wouldnt have crept near your wincon, as you did with us. It was'nt feasible. It was too natural you helped us. Too natural for some of us, to feel gratified, too natural for some, to think tie as "good". It was too natural.

Think for a moment. Would you have ever helped the baddies?
Never!