## Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum

 Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account. As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends. Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games. If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top. If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen. Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
Guest Message by DevFuse

# Xxxx Rollo

1164 replies to this topic

Senior Member

• Members
• 922 posts

Posted 02 June 2011 - 01:13 AM

BLEEDERS and CREEPERS

If they have the same score, some out of --EE-ERS are correct

--EE---- is most likely.

BLOOPERS=0 would prove --EE---- if BLEEDERS/CREEPERS=2
• 0

### #42 WombatBreath

WombatBreath

Senior Member

• Members
• 3117 posts

Posted 02 June 2011 - 01:21 AM

EJECTIVE - ?
• 0

### #43 JDave

JDave

• Members
• 389 posts

Posted 02 June 2011 - 05:44 AM

```????????

RIGIDITY - 1     BRAINDEN - 0     BLEEDERS - 0

INITIALS - 0     CLOISTER - 0     CREEPERS - 0

HANDCUFF - 0     BLEEDING - 2     EJECTIVE - 2

BLACKBOX - 1     CREEPING - 2

BLACKOUT - 1     SHREDDER - 0```
I didn't include BLOOPERS since BLEEDERS/CREEPERS didn't equal 2. Was that your intention?
• 0

Senior Member

• Members
• 922 posts

Posted 02 June 2011 - 06:14 AM

Yeah

CREEPIER
if 0, then NG are last 2 as only change from creepiNG
if 1, then -----I-- b/c CREEPers=0, CREEPing=2, and if NG were correct, score would be 0, so only 1 of those can be and I must be.
Score greater than 2 means there's a misscore somewhere.
• 0

### #45 WombatBreath

WombatBreath

Senior Member

• Members
• 3117 posts

Posted 02 June 2011 - 06:20 AM

I struggled but couldn't define any proofs that wouldn't allow someone else to ninja me , so I will just guess...

ZUCCHINI - ? (purely a process of elimination)
• 0

### #46 JDave

JDave

• Members
• 389 posts

Posted 02 June 2011 - 04:01 PM

```ZUCCHINI
RIGIDITY - 1     BRAINDEN - 0     BLEEDERS - 0
INITIALS - 0     CLOISTER - 0     CREEPERS - 0
HANDCUFF - 0     BLEEDING - 2     EJECTIVE - 2
BLACKBOX - 1     CREEPING - 2     CREEPIER - 1
BLACKOUT - 1     SHREDDER - 0

Score changes:  Shadow7 +5,   WombatBreath +10,   JDave +14```
Good job WbB! When I saw an 'ing' word come out I suddenly realized that it wasn't going to be much longer. And it did seem that modifiying words to create proofs is harder with longer words.

Spoiler for Scores:

• 0

Senior Member

• Members
• 922 posts

Posted 02 June 2011 - 06:23 PM

So he's next?
• 0

### #48 JDave

JDave

• Members
• 389 posts

Posted 02 June 2011 - 09:12 PM

That has been the standard modus operandi.
• 0

### #49 WombatBreath

WombatBreath

Senior Member

• Members
• 3117 posts

Posted 02 June 2011 - 10:42 PM

OK new one...

```???????? (8 letters 'Standard' clue points)

Score Changes: none yet
```

• 0

Senior Member

• Members
• 922 posts

Posted 02 June 2011 - 11:03 PM

RAINBOWS
• 0

#### 0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users