## Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum

Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account. As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends. Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games. If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top. If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen. Thanks and enjoy the Den :-) |

# Bavarian

### #31

Posted 19 March 2008 - 12:18 AM

### #32

Posted 20 March 2008 - 05:29 PM

### #33

Posted 24 April 2008 - 05:22 AM

### #34

Posted 18 December 2008 - 03:25 PM

First to anyone applying the C1V1 = C2V2 formula, it doesn't work - you're not only changing V2, but also C2 (i.e. I just converted everything to Molarity because I like working with moles - 10 moles/1L = x moles/1.3L is the natural route to go, BUT if you solve for unknown concentration "X", you're neglecting the amount of tonic poured into the fernet).

It's been too long since General Chemistry for me (ok, so maybe the truth is I've just killed too many brain cells), so I can't work this out using solubility rules. HOWEVER, using logic you pour tonic into fernet. You then pour the same volume of fernet solution back into the tonic, but this solution also contains tonic. You are therefore removing some of the original tonic poured into the fernet (while at same time pouring same amount of fernet into tonic as tonic originally poured into fernet).

That being case, there is more fernet in tonic

Are you saying there is more fernet in tonic than tonic in fernet?

If so....

Try this.

Try removing an amount of tonic from the glass of tonic, then try to remove and amount of fernet from the glass of fernet, such that: when you pour the removed tonic into the original fernet and the removed fernet into the original tonic, each glass contains 10cl and the original amount of removed tonic does not equal the original amount of removed fernet.

It cannot be done because the total amount of fernet in the problem must be equal to the total amount of tonic at all times.

Therefore, if there is more fernet in tonic than tonic in fernet; than the total amount of fernet would somehow be greater than the total amount of tonic. This is not possible, so the ratio must remain the same.

### #35

Posted 21 December 2008 - 03:25 AM

Actually I found Fernet to be more.Spoiler for answer

If you take 3 cl of tonic and put it into Fernet, spread out 3cl evenly in the fernet. Meaning distribute 3cl to every 1.

1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1

,3-.3-.3-.3-.3-.3-.3-.3-.3-.3

Ratio is 1:0.3

Now take 3cl out, thats ( After a lot of math) 2.25 Fernet and .75 (,728934) And mix it back in.

Therfore you have 2.25 Fernet into Tonic

Add up the remaining dispersed tonic thats in Fernet and its 2.1

### #36

Posted 25 December 2008 - 01:53 AM

First off, you need to understand that in mixtures, particles disperse evenly, but it does not mean that they become 5/5 or te liesk unless even amounts of both substances are mixed.

At first the glasses are both 100 percent After the 3cl of tonic is poured into the fernet we have in Tonic1 a ratio of 7 parts tonic out of 7 parts total. In the second glass we get a ratio of 3 parts tonic of 13 particles altogether and 10 parts fernet out of 13 particles altogether. That is a ratio of 3 parts tonic to 10 parts fernet. Meaning that every molecule is now 3 atoms of tonic and 10 atoms of fernet. The ratios are NOT equal by any means. It also means that the 3cl of your newly formed mixture that you pour back into the glass of 7 parts tonic to 7 parts total is ALSO a ratio of 3 parts tonic to 10 parts fernet.

You add the 3/10 ratio of tonic/fernet to the 7/0 ratio of tonic/fernet and you a ration of 10 to 10 for Tonic1.

But in your second glass you still have a ratio of 3/10 making them uneven.

If you have any feedback I would greatly appreciate it.

Thank you.

Jenna

### #37

Posted 26 December 2008 - 06:31 PM

Nope.The answer to this puzzle is wrong.

No, you can't make new molecules that way.Meaning that every molecule is now 3 atoms of tonic and 10 atoms of fernet.

Let's do this step by step.But in your second glass you still have a ratio of 3/10 making them uneven.

If you have any feedback I would greatly appreciate it.

Thank you.

Jenna

10 cl of tonic in one glass (Glass 1) and 10 cl of fernet in the other (Glass 2).

Pour 3 cl of tonic to the glass with fernet and mix thoroughly. Glass 1 now has 7 cl of tonic and Glass 2 has 10 cl of fernet and 3 cl of tonic. Glass 2 has 3.33... times more fernet than tonic.

If we remove 3 cl of the mixture from Glass 2, about 2.3 cl of what we removed will be fernet and about .7 cl tonic. That means that Glass 2 now contains about 7.7 cl of fernet and 2.3 cl of tonic.

Glass 1 has 7 cl of tonic. If we add that 2.3 cl of fernet and .7 cl of tonic in to Glass 1, Glass 1 will now contain 2.3 cl of fernet and 7.7 cl of tonic.

### #38

Posted 28 December 2008 - 05:08 AM

10/13 of 10 cl is 2.3 cl?The math is interesting; when you place the the 3 cl of tonic into the glass of fernet the glass now contains 3/13 parts tonic. Assuming that the tonic is mixed evenly throughout, when you take the 3cl the second time, 10/13 of it is fernent, which is approximatly 2.3 cl. The remaining tonic in the fernent is 10/13 of the 10 cl, which is approximatly 2.3 cl as well.

### #39

Posted 28 December 2008 - 05:53 AM

10/13 of 10 cl is 2.3 cl?

*"when you take the 3cl the second time, 10/13 of it is fernent, which is approximately 2.3 cl"*

10/13 of 3 is about 2.3.

#### 0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users