93 replies to this topic

[araver]

P.S I also want to hear the baddies reasonings for their kills.

We got lucky.

Spoiler for

The first kill was a sort of necessity - 3 spies around (Holmes, Wigging, MacDonald) 2 of them our target in wincon.
Figured maurice was a good place to start since he likes to know me if he's a spy (slight "meta-gaming", I admit - I could claim random and lie but I won't).
N1)
araver: Spy Slick.
Vine: - (Do nothing, save tries for later)
Vine: Kill maurice.

Answer was "Moriarty learned that slick spied someone". That combined with the nightpost it gave us a lucky Slick=Holmes. If more active spies were around AND a different wording of the night-post, we wouldn't have that certainty.

D1) woon: Redirect Slick to Framm18
(As I said, I suspected Framm to be Watson from his quick vote which did not target Glyc)
Didn't work in the lynch because of LJ Wasn't around at that time.

N2)araver: spy Framm18
Vine: - (no arrest since it's even night)
woon: Kill Framm18
We needed confirmation if Framm is indeed Watson. Or yes, a role to claim (even an indie) if it's not him.
"moriarty learned that framm was going to save someone."

D2) woon:Redirect EDM's vote to Slick.
And that's that.
I was hoping that maurice was MacDonald, but in case the game didn't stop, we probably would have gone after harvey next as I thought he's Wiggings (incorrectly). I was assuming Mycroft is still inactive (incorrectly) and would have probably spied Glyc.

[araver]

I was actually gonna post something saying I was going to expect revenge on 'im.

There's gonna be a good bit of meta-gaming if any of those goodies and araver are in the next game. And especially if Izzy is in there.

I'm probably going to plead no-contest on D1 if I'm a less-important goodie. It only seems fair.
However, I really need a defense in case I'm an important goodie. I'll think about that.

[araver]

I do not like that araver. That means I die N1 roughly 30% of the time? BTW I spied LMS.

I took my death N1 as sort of "hey maybe his logic is kinda sound" respect.

{edit - just realized there are some instances when we are both bad (then they'll be sorry), so my estimation is overstated. But still}

Respect for your logic was involved, but I can't prove that. For this game, there's no way I could protect myself if you had a glimpse of me as a spy.

I would like a game where were both bad Just don't tell anyone

[maurice]

Respect for your logic was involved, but I can't prove that. For this game, there's no way I could protect myself if you had a glimpse of me as a spy.

I would like a game where were both bad Just don't tell anyone

See, I've only spied on you once, and my reasoning was what I said my reasoning was for voting for you. Yours was the first name I recognized.

Now for this Mafia I figured I know some players a little better, so I went after someone I didn't know. You were never really an option because it was too obvious, I thought. That being said I'll probably target you next time because its too obvious that I won't target you...

And I meant that I'd like to think that respect for my logic was involved...I know better.

Edited by maurice, 03 December 2010 - 11:18 PM.

[NickFleming]

I'm probably going to plead no-contest on D1 if I'm a less-important goodie. It only seems fair.
However, I really need a defense in case I'm an important goodie. I'll think about that.

For next game planning your defense already, are you?

[araver]

See, I've only spied on you once, and my reasoning was what I said my reasoning was for voting for you. Yours was the first name I recognized.

Now for this Mafia I figured I know some players a little better, so I went after someone I didn't know. You were never really an option because it was too obvious, I thought. That being said I'll probably target you next time because its too obvious that I won't target you...

And I meant that I'd like to think that respect for my logic was involved...I know better.

And here's how the meta-gaming madness starts. I'm probably going to end up being killed N1, thus relieving others of the "pleasure" of holding that "night-one-casualty-forever" role.

What I meant is that respect-for-your-logic was involved. But you'll have to trust me, since I can't prove it, right?
Also, I was trying to keep your promise to slick, so I did not kill him N1.
Same with Framm, who has also been a night-one-casualty so he knew the feeling. So, I kinda offered you the same gift
Now, you probably want to offer it back to me ... it's ok, I understand

EDIT: And I'm over 500 and missed it

Edited by araver, 03 December 2010 - 11:31 PM.

[LJayden]

whoa, that didn't take long GG all, and see! i wasn't a baddie!

PS: didn't expect this to end so soon, finalizing my game right now

edit: emote goof

Edited by LJayden, 04 December 2010 - 02:29 AM.

[akaslickster]

I wish it would last. Cruddd. I wish marth was active also. So I lost again due to inactivity. Somebody slap them for me. GG y'all.

[akaslickster]

Slick could have prevented his lynching today though too. I never got more of a defense than you'll be sorry. And he knew my role so it would have been an easy proof to me

I disagree. I am usually dead before this time. It was a tie lynch. The coin was not in my favor so don't throw stones.

[araver]

I disagree. I am usually dead before this time. It was a tie lynch. The coin was not in my favor so don't throw stones.

*cough* baddie vote manipulation *cough*