## Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum

 Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account. As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends. Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games. If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top. If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen. Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
Guest Message by DevFuse

# Savoury

25 replies to this topic

### #1 rookie1ja

rookie1ja

Senior Member

• 1344 posts
• Gender:Male
• Location:Slovakia

Posted 30 March 2007 - 07:44 PM

Complex Deduction - Back to the Number Puzzles
This is definitely one of the harder number puzzles on this site.
A teacher says: I'm thinking of two natural numbers greater than 1. Try to guess what they are.
The first student knows their product and the other one knows their sum.
First: I do not know the sum.
Second: I knew that. The sum is less than 14.
First: I knew that. However, now I know the numbers.
Second: And so do I.
What were the numbers?

This old topic is locked since it was answered many times. You can check solution in the Spoiler below.
Pls visit New Puzzles section to see always fresh brain teasers.

Spoiler for Solution

Spoiler for old wording

• 0

Optical Illusions
Support BrainDen

"To start: Press any key... Where's the 'any' key?" - Homer Simpson

### #2 shiang

shiang

Newbie

• Members
• 6 posts

Posted 28 April 2007 - 04:40 AM

lol, this one brings back memories and I figured this out in like 10 min when I was a sophmore in HS (teacher was preaty impressed), I actually found this one preaty eazy as its a process of elimination. The 2nd stament "I knew that, and the sum is less than 14" forces the sum to be 11 because it is the only number where all the sets of the sums have have to have 1 non-prime number and have more than one possible set of sums.

2-9
3-8
4-7
5-6

this means the product has to be 18,24,28, or 30 and of those numbers the only one where all possible sums of two numbers gives a product less than 14 is 18.

2+9 < 14
2+12 = 14
2+14 > 14
2+15 > 14

so the product is 18 and the sum is 11, the two numbers are 2 and 9.

I think my solution is slightly more elegant, ...ok my ego got the best of me again.

*if two natural numbers x*y = K and x<y then (x+1)(y-1) >= K because if multiplied out it would be xy+y-x-1 so if x<y then y-x-1 >= 0. I just figured this on the spot so I thing it's right but I'm not 2 sure if there are exceptions. Keep in mind the initial conditions.
• 0

### #3 shiang

shiang

Newbie

• Members
• 6 posts

Posted 28 April 2007 - 04:47 AM

accidental repeat
• 0

### #4 milkplus71

milkplus71

Newbie

• Members
• 1 posts

Posted 28 June 2007 - 05:52 AM

was teacher preaty impressed with your spelling?
• 0

### #5 walkingagh

walkingagh

Newbie

• Members
• 3 posts

Posted 06 July 2007 - 05:02 PM

I came up with the same solution as you did. Your equation with K was interesting, but trivial.

The largest the product of any two numbers that sum to X can be is if each of the numbers is x/2. Geometrically this is saying that a square has more area per outer edge than a non-square rectangle. Your statement is a corollary to this much more powerful theorem.
• 0

### #6 eikonoklaste

eikonoklaste

Newbie

• Members
• 2 posts

Posted 02 August 2007 - 12:34 AM

hahaha... right; one of the hardest on the site, please.
• 0

### #7 stormpool

stormpool

Newbie

• Members
• 2 posts

Posted 08 August 2007 - 10:01 AM

Read the question again and assume that each students responds to the other instantly as I thought.

They are geniuses..
• 0

### #8 vebshid

vebshid

Newbie

• Members
• 1 posts

Posted 26 August 2007 - 01:36 PM

"3 10 ... NO - the product does not have all possible sums smaller than 14"
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Why the the product should have all possible sums smaller than 14?
and
what's the meaning of "First: I knew that. However, now I know the numbers."
what does the First "knew"? I can't understand from the text, maybe that's because i'm not a English native people~
• 0

### #9 1stone

1stone

Newbie

• Members
• 1 posts

Posted 25 September 2007 - 11:45 AM

You don't have to take all combinations to work this one out. It is based on the following:

If a number is the product of two primes, then you know their sum.

Clues:
A: I don't know the sum. So the number is not the product of two primes. One of the numbers must be 4, 6, 8, 9 or 10.

B: I knew that. This is the biggest clue! If the sum can also be a sum of two primes, then B would not be absolutely sure that A does not know the numbers eg if B's sum was 6, then it could be that A's product is 9=3x3, from which A could immediately deduce the two numbers. So the fact that B knew that A did not know the sum limits the sum to be 11. Every other number under 14 is the sum of two primes: 4=2+2, 5=2+3, 6=3+3, 7=3+4, 8=3+5, 9=2+7, 10=3+7, 12=5+7, 13=2+11.

So the possibilities are 2 9, 3 8, 4 7, or 5 6.

B: The sum is less than 14
A: I knew that. This implies that the product cannot be factored out into two numbers whose sum is larger or equal to 14. Now the largest sum that the factors can add to is when we take a large and a small factor. This eliminates 3x8=24=2x12, which allows 2+12=14;v or 4x7=28=2x14 with 2+14>14; or 5x6=30=2x15, 2+15>14; leaving only 2x9=18=3x6. So the numbers are 2 and 9.
• 0

### #10 hansonjw

hansonjw

Newbie

• Members
• 1 posts

Posted 09 December 2007 - 03:45 AM

Can someone explain to me why it is not 3 and 4?
• 0

#### 0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users